upper extremity functional index spanish version upper extremity functional index spanish version

The results for the psychometric properties support the findings of the previous research on the original English version of the ULFI indicating broad cross-cultural adaptions would be appropriate to other diverse cultural and linguistic groups. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the The test-retest reliability was high at (r=0.93) with an individual range of 0.92 to 0.95. ; Yelland, M.; Melloh, M.; Burkett, B. 2014 Jun 27;12:96. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-96. Background: The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is an internationally widely used outcome measure with robust, valid psychometric properties. eCollection 2023. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of Urdu version of upper limb functional index; a validity and reliability study. Dawson, J.; Rogers, K.; Fitzpatrick, R.; Carr, A. The present study has several limitations. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33381. 03. J Hand Surg 2004,29(2):159164. A two stage observational study was conducted involving: initial translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the ULFI [7] to Spanish; then subsequent prospective concurrent completion with a general health questionnaire, the Euroqol Health Questionnaire 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-3L) [41] and an upper limb regional criterion, the QuickDASH-Sp [42]. 0000083070 00000 n Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. ROC curve; outcome assessment; physiology; reproducibility of results; upper limb. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. startxref most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal. To assess upper extremity function in patients with musculoskeletal upper extremity disorders Therapeutic area Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena Musculoskeletal Diseases Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Psychological Phenomena Therapeutic indications Muscular Diseases Musculoskeletal Pain 0000088717 00000 n -, McPhail SM, Bagraith KS, Schippers M, Wells PJ, Hatton A. No special ; van Laarhoven, H.W.M. For more information, please refer to Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Epub 2013 Jun 27. 0000080372 00000 n 0000075733 00000 n 0000079311 00000 n Methods: Cross cultural adaptation and validation of a Spanish version of the Lower Limb Functional Index. Conclusion . Conclusions: The primary objective of this aspect of the study was to perform a translation that can ensure the conceptual equivalence of the used terms. The correlation matrix for the ULFI-Sp was determined suitable from the Kaiser-Meyer-Oklin values (0.89) and Barletts Test of Sphericity (p<0.001). 0000004613 00000 n 0000155003 00000 n Adv Orthop. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009,90(1):151169. -. All questionnaires were completed and two assessors performed the initial and any subsequent assessments, but were blinded to baseline scores in order to ensure independent collection of outcome data. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Methods A two stage observational study was conducted. Reliability and validity of two versions of the upper extremity functional index. ; Gabel, P.C. The upper extremity postthrombotic syndrome score: an international Delphi consensus study to determine the score's functional disability component. 4 0 obj Correspondence to ; Bruce, B.; Rose, M.; et al. Google Scholar, Dale LM, Strain-Riggs SR: Comparing responsiveness of the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and the Upper Limb Functional Index. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! However, the UEFI-15 item is scored 0-59 and converted to give an interval level total score 0-100 with 0 indicating worst state and 100 best state. Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index on Breast Cancer Survivor. [1] The original UEFI consists of 20 questions on a 5- point rating scale assessing level of difficulty in performing activities of daily living using the upper extremities including household and work activities, hobbies, lifting a bag of groceries, washing your scalp, pushing up on your hands, driving etc. The QuickDASH-Sp had greater than >30% of missing responses affecting 41 of the 126 respondent questionnaires. 2014 May 17;12:75. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-75. Patient reported outcome (PRO) measures [1, 2] are primarily used to objectively reflect a patients health or functional status at any given time and to detect changes in this status as a response to an intervention [3]. Predictors of Altered Upper Extremity Function During the First Year After Breast Cancer Treatment. 0000076125 00000 n BMC Musculoskelet Disord. There are currently two versions of the upper extremity functional index; UEFI 20-item and UEFI 15-item. eCollection 2023 Jan. Phys Ther. The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is a self-report questionnaire that evaluates disability and health-related quality of life after stroke (Mudler & Nijland, 2016). PDF RESEARCH Open Access Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and De Groef, A.; Meeus, M.; De Vrieze, T.; Vos, L.; Van Kampen, M.; Christiaens, M.-R.; Neven, P.; Geraerts, I.; Devoogdt, N. Pain Characteristics as Important Contributing Factors to Upper Limb Dysfunctions in Breast Cancer Survivors at Long Term. The translation process ensured the conceptual equivalence of the used terms. National Library of Medicine Costello, A.B. pMCID values were 8/80 for the UEFI-20 and 6.7/100 for the UEFI-15; pMCID was higher for people whose non-dominant arm was affected. 6, e1261-7. Their presenting conditions and diagnoses were broadly classified into five categories (Table1). Work 2012. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Upper Limb Functional Index Spanish version (ULFI-Sp) in the BCS. Article Not only a direct and reverse translation methodology was applied, also a specialist in the field as detailed and recommended in the specialized scientific literature (Figure1) [43, 44]. The .gov means its official. The correlation between items and the regression score from MLE, communalities, and the average score for each item is shown in, Therefore, a new 14-item model (short version) was tested with those items with communalities higher than 0.3. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. The full sample determined internal consistency, concurrent criterion validity, construct validity and factor structure; a subgroup (n=35) determined reliability at seven days. Salerno DF, Copley-Merriman C, Taylor TN, Shinogle J, Schulz RM: A review of functional status measures for workers with upper extremity disorders. 0000074860 00000 n Pajares B, Roldn-Jimnez C, Alba E, Cuesta-Vargas AI. 0000129392 00000 n Privacy The 15-item LEFS-Ar demonstrated evidence supporting its internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity as a measure of lower extremity function in Arabic-speaking patients with lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience. Man Ther 2009,14(2):206212. 0000076361 00000 n Hagstrom, A.D.; Shorter, K.A. Methods: A psychometric validation study of the ULFI-Sp was conducted on 216 voluntary breast cancer survivors. Before 0000076681 00000 n https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064997, Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals, You can make submissions to other journals. Rasch-Validated Version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index for 2015;28(3):489-95. doi: 10.3233/BMR-140545. Clinicians may assess the upper limbs after breast cancer. Les valeurs du CDM se sont tablies 9,4/80 pour le questionnaire IFMS-20 et 8,8/100 pour le questionnaire IFMS-15. Chicago: Scientific Software International; 2007. The Oxford Shoulder Score Revisited. See this image and copyright information in PMC. A construct is not restricted to one set of observable indicators or attributes and additional indicators will need to be considered in future research. Modification of the Upper Limb Functional Index to a Three-Point Response Improves Clinimetric Properties. La validit convergente transversale a t dtermine par le lien (r de Pearson) entre les mesures de fonction et de douleur prises au moment 1. 0000095773 00000 n Factor structure was one-dimensional and supported construct validity. 0000072523 00000 n Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) into Brazilian Portuguese in patients with chronic upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. government site. 0000070500 00000 n : Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient-reported Outcomes. Alderman AK, Chung KC: Measuring Outcomes in Hand Surgery. 0000072187 00000 n The exclusion criteria were under 18 years old and low reading comprehension due to completing the questionnaire. 0000155991 00000 n 0000070836 00000 n 10.1016/j.cps.2007.10.001. 0000071017 00000 n Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Trials. Longitudinal validity was determined by the association (Pearson's r) between function and pain change scores (Time 1-Time 3). MDC values were 9.4/80 for the UEFI-20 and 8.8/100 for the UEFI-15. Patient-Reported Upper Extremity Outcome Measures Used in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review. positive feedback from the reviewers. Google Scholar, Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN, Group UEC: Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. The 15-item Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI-15) hierarchical structure, depicting the arrangement of the UEFI-15 on an interval-level measure of upper extremity function as captured by the UEFI-15. Though various region specific PROs have been used to assess upper-limb functional status, it is accepted that there is no gold standard [8, 1012]. A physical therapy outpatients population was used for evaluation of the ULFI-Sps four critical psychometric properties. Stock SR, Streiner D: The impact of neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders on the lives of affected workers: development of a new functional status index. For the patients who rated their arm status after surgery as better ("much better" and "somewhat better") and as "unchanged," the difference in area under ROC curves for DASH & QuickDASH=0.01, indicating excellent convergent validity with the DASH, as there is no ability to discriminate a difference between the 2 groups. GQAzTeJQwe$Eu/A$J#m@ F6& &mb,YHdN{%E,K+(S msNZ}HbJbz >wUA[@=%8wjJaM 0000004290 00000 n This is considered to support the criterion validity of the ULFI-Sp however as it is not as strong as findings in the previous research that used a region specific criterion standard that was advocated as representative of the upper limb kinetic chain. CAS 0000086093 00000 n permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. Background: The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is an internationally widely used outcome measure with robust, valid psychometric properties. The determined values were satisfactory and supportive of the findings of the ULFI as a 3-point scale, particularly in the areas of internal consistency, factor structure and reliability. It has two, 4-item, optional modules used to measure symptoms and function in athletes, artists, and workers who require a high level of function. Possible range on the UEFI 20-item from 0 80 with 0 indicating lowest functional status and 80 indicating highest functional status. Results: Disclaimer. The ULFI-Sp demonstrated high internal consistency ( = 0.94) and reliability (r = 0.93). Introduction The Upper Limb Functional Index . Disclaimer. The KaiserMeyerOklin test determined the correlation matrix (0.889) for the ULFI-Sp in female BCS and the Bartletts Test of Sphericity (chi-squared value = 2087.167 and df 300, The ULFI-Sp showed a high degree consistency, as illustrated by the high Cronbach value ( = 0.916) with an individual item range between 0.868 and 0.875. Terms and Conditions, The Spanish lower extremity functional scale: a reliable, valid and official website and that any information you provide is encrypted The KolmogorovSmirnov test by one sample (significance > 0.05) was used to calculate the samples distribution and normality. Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. x]#+1vD7,1=r5^XJS/~`lc EY"/{pIQ$Da;U^Y|QTVMWM]_+^U>w?)Qn+W U>zM[ r^Of] DUU,#vasW8`5Z9wvU7]]Uir_ 7%[ucqsnWcyUN&w6 z56}=+J'[7*teJNP#k$ o{}_7N,qir/\Z,o~/wBrp+'M$ F,U/tkZzE x/x =_R&V${1_7E] ulv.Q\#g+xf, ,fVcUf17pfW{,:oWx?\:U/ ; McNeely, M.L. ; Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M.W.G.N. ; Mayer, D.K. Upper Limb Disorders (ULDs) are highly prevalent even years after a diagnosis. 2013 Nov;93(11):1507-19. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130041. Development and validation of the Upper Extremity Function Scale. 5 0 obj The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI): cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version. Link to Instrument Instrument Details Acronym SIS Area of Assessment Activities of Daily Living Cognition Communication Depression Functional Mobility Gait General Health Life Participation Martn-Martn, J.; Pajares-Hachero, B.; Alba-Conejo, E.; Ribelles, N.; Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. 0000074780 00000 n SK =Q!E%J&AX-qU]pUY(E_e w2R[^&7J2,b{_'/4ThAO)^"l4!)|^#PIG7~HLId&QeEy.f/p%DT/Yzp3q7 The chi-square test was used to show differences between observed covariance and expected matrices. Therefore the aims of this paper were: to describe the process of translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original ULFI to Spanish; and to subsequently assess the four critical psychometric properties of reliability, factor structure, internal consistency, and concurrent criterion validity for clinical use with Spanish speakers. 0000095818 00000 n Finally, the inclusion of Hispanic/Latino/ South American participants in future studies could potentially provide confirming or conflicting linguistic information due to the cultural and ethnic difference with respect to the Spanish participants. 0000100655 00000 n Criterion validity with the EQ-5D-3 L was fair and inversely correlated (r = -0.59). 0000073041 00000 n 10.5014/ajot.2011.000794, Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Pascariello B, Ferriero G: Suggestions for refinement of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH): a factor analysis and Rasch validation study. The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) [1416] and the shortened QuickDASH [17] version are two prominent examples. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency of Spanish SPADI and The psychometric properties were as follows: analysis of the factor structure by maximum likelihood extraction (MLE), internal consistency, and construct validity by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). This indicated that the correlation matrix was unlikely to be an identity matrix and was therefore suitable for PCA. ; Mahar, A.L. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012, Lehman LA, Woodbury M, Velozo CA: Examination of the factor structure of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. 10.1157/13093053. The developed short version of the ULFI-SP is preferable to assess upper limb function in Spanish BCS. The ULFI-Sp demonstrated high internal consistency (=0.94) and reliability (r=0.93). Given the high prevalence of ULD in this population and the wider versions of ULFI across different languages, this studys results may be transferred to clinical practice and integrated as part of upper limb assessment after breast cancer. Adv Orthop 2012, 273421: 10. A total of 126 volunteers (4921years, 54.8% female) with a variety of upper limb conditions of >12weeks duration were recruited consecutively from the Physical Therapy Clinic at the Malaga University. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves estimated the pMCID using Time 1-Time 3 change scores and average patient/therapist GRC. interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. Schermelleh-Engel, K.; Moosbrugger, H.; Mller, H. Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. Tonga, E.; Durutrk, N.; Gabel, P.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. (PDF) Upper Extremity Functional Index - ResearchGate 0000082422 00000 n J Occup Environ Med 1997,39(12):11951202. PDF Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) - SSPC This comparative analysis in separate studies has provided scope to suggest the ULFI was preferred to the criterion tools of the DASH [6, 17, 38], UEFS [6] and QuickDASH [7, 26] due to a combination of enhanced psychometric and practical characteristics. Longitudinal Change of Treatment-Related Upper Limb Dysfunction and Its Impact on Late Dysfunction in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Prospective Cohort Study. The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) [32] which is criticized due to it development methodology using a specific workers population in a small data set with a high average age [6, 8]. Gabel, C.P. Gabel, C.P. In the same study, the longitudinal validity coefficient between the UEFI and the UEFS was 0.74. This study aimed to assess. % ; Bartlett, M.S. Des courbes des caractristiques oprationnelles du rcepteur (COR) ont estim la pDMCI partir des scores de changement entre le moment 1 et le moment 3 et les EGC moyennes patient/thrapeute. A total of 216 voluntary BCS from Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital of Malaga participated in the study. Harrington, S.; Michener, L.A.; Kendig, T.; Miale, S.; George, S.Z. The total score was accounted for, not the individual questionnaire response items.